Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458589›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Case report: Preliminary experience with organ-preserving treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer in the immunotherapy era: a case series of four patients.

Genrong Yang, Han Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Genrong YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Han WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, a comprehensive treatment strategy primarily centered on surgery is commonly adopted in clinical practice. Although the minimally invasive approach has reduced surgical trauma, the altered postoperative physiological structure often leads to impaired digestive function, reflux, and malnutrition, which significantly impact patients' quality of life. With the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, some patients achieve a pathological complete response(pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. As a result, these patients may become ideal candidates for organ-preservation strategies. Case presentation: A retrospective analysis was conducted on four patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received chemoimmunotherapy with selective radiotherapy. Pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. All four patients achieved complete pathological response. Cases 1, 2, and 3 were followed for 42 months, 31 months, and 25 months, respectively, with no recurrence. Case 4 experienced recurrence after 18 months of follow-up. Reinitiated chemoimmunotherapy was ineffective, and the tumor showed slow progression on subsequent lines of therapy. Conclusion: Chemoimmunotherapy with selective radiotherapy may offer an organ-preserving opportunity for locally advanced esophageal cancer, with some patients achieving long-term recurrence-free survival. However, efficacy varies individually, and further optimization of treatment strategies is warranted.

Indexed as

chemtherapyesophageal cancerimmunotherapyorgan preservationradiothearpy

Identifiers

PMID41458589
PMCPMC12738310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.