SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Radiogenomics and CSF-Based Liquid Biopsy Sequencing for Precision Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The scientific evolution of the Ommaya reservoir: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- The role of the WD40-repeat protein family in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Molecular Diagnosis, Disease Monitoring, and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma: epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and therapeutic resistance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Evolving Landscape of Glioblastoma Research: Integrating Therapeutic Advances and Diagnostic Frontiers.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Alpha particle therapy in glioblastoma: emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of response, and translational opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Long-read sequencing for cancer liquid biopsy: advancing precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising tool for molecular characterization and monitoring in gliomas. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), compared to plasma, as well as factors influencing its detection. Methods: We systematically reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 reporting on ctDNA detection in CSF from adult glioma patients. Pooled analyses compared detection rates between CSF and plasma, CSF collection routes, assay types (targeted vs. bespoke), and IDH mutation status. Molecular concordance with tumor tissue and clinical correlations were also assessed. Results: Twelve studies comprising 388 patients with WHO grade II-IV gliomas were included. ctDNA detection in CSF was achieved in 82% of patients, compared with only 16% in plasma. Tumor-CSF molecular concordance was 90% (95% CI 86-93). Detection was significantly higher in CSF than in plasma (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.24). No significant differences were observed between IDH-wildtype and IDH-mutant gliomas (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.26-2.02) or between intracranial and lumbar CSF collection techniques (p > 0.9). Conclusions: CSF outperforms plasma for ctDNA-based molecular profiling in gliomas, offering both diagnostic and prognostic applications. Detection is numerically higher in IDH-wildtype gliomas, underscoring its potential role as a biomarker in this subgroup. While no significant differences were observed between collection routes in the pooled analysis, single-study evidence suggests a possible advantage of intracranial sampling, which requires further prospective evaluation. Its integration into clinical workflows may aid in cases where tissue biopsy is not feasible. Standardized methodologies and prospective multicenter validation are needed to enable routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.