Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458561›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

Determining the feasibility of randomising infants, children and young people to invasive and non-invasive urine sampling techniques (FROG): Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial and mixed methods perspectives' study of RCT feasibility.

Paula Taylor Miller, Clíona McDowell, Ashley Agus, Lynn Murphy, Stuart Hartshorn, Srinivas Bandi, Bronagh Blackwood, Nefyn Williams, Damian Roland, Kathryn Ferris and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Paula Taylor MillerNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6842-2566
Clíona McDowellNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Ashley AgusNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Lynn MurphyNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-6337
Stuart HartshornBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, UK.
Srinivas BandiPaediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, Children's Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4689-8851
Bronagh BlackwoodWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-5381
Nefyn WilliamsUniversity of Liverpool Institute of Population Health, Liverpool, England, UK.
Damian RolandPaediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, Children's Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-5144
Kathryn FerrisWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-7466
Andrew MarshallOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-0425
Alastair SutcliffeUniversity College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, England, UK.
Mike ClarkeSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Kerry WoolfallUniversity of Liverpool Institute of Population Health, Liverpool, England, UK.
Thomas WaterfieldWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9452-7716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the second most common serious bacterial infection in children. When healthcare practitioners are unsure if an infant, child, or young person has a UTI they perform a urine test. A midstream sample is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for obtaining urine for testing. However, collecting urine from children who are unable to provide a midstream urine sample is challenging. Samples can be collected either by non-invasive (clean catch) or invasive methods (trans-urethral bladder catheter or suprapubic aspirate). Non-invasive methods are slow and prone to contamination but are painless. Invasive methods are less prone to contamination and are quick but can cause pain and distress. Methods: This is a mixed methods feasibility study comprising of three parts. Part 1 is a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial. The trial aims to evaluate the feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing invasive and non-invasive sampling methods for infants, children and young people (N = 100). Resource use will be assessed by parent reported questionnaire and mixed methods descriptors reported by healthcare professionals (n = 24). A cost analysis will assess the urine collection methods, informing a future cost-effectiveness analysis. Part 2 is an embedded mixed methods perspectives' study including interviews with parents (n = 15-20) and children (n = 10-15), five focus groups (n = 6-8 per group) and interviews (n = 10) with healthcare professionals aiming to assess feasibility and acceptability of the trial. Part 3 is a stakeholder (n = 40) consensus meeting determining a final definitive study design. Discussion: The results of the study will inform a recommendation and decision on progression and design of a definitive RCT for infants, children and young people who have a suspected urine infection but cannot provide a midstream urine sample. Trial registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 84676764: Feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing invasive and non-invasive urine sampling techniques in children under 16 years old with a suspected urinary tract infection

Indexed as

catheterclean- catchfeasibilityPaediatricRCTsuprapubic aspirateurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID41458561
PMCPMC12741557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.