ArticleNIHR open research2025
Public engagement, evidence review and survey to adapt a whole-school intervention to prevent bullying in English primary schools.
Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bullying increases during primary school and causes multiple mental/physical health harms. Whole-school interventions offer a feasible means of reducing bullying but few have been evaluated in primary schools. We previously trialled the Learning Together intervention in secondary schools comprising local needs assessment, student and staff participation in decision-making through 'action groups', restorative practice, and a social and emotional skills curriculum. This intervention was effective in preventing bullying and improving mental wellbeing. We aimed to adapt Learning Together for primary schools (Learning Together Primary Schools (LTPS)). This paper reports on how we adapted intervention materials to produce the LTPS intervention through a review of research evidence, online survey, and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE). Methods: We conducted a rapid review of existing systematic reviews, online survey of primary schools in south-east England, and multiple PPIE workshops. PPIE was conducted with two primary schools (10 staff members and 20 pupils), with a group of 10 pupils from five primary schools, and with a group of six parents with primary-school-aged children. Conclusions: We refined our initial plans for LTPS, developing an intervention appropriate for primary schools and supported by full materials, training and external facilitation. We retained key components including restorative practice and action groups and made several refinements, including guidance for action group implementation to accommodate for primary schools' smaller capacities. No refinements were made to the intervention theory of change. We found that it is possible to refine and elaborate interventions to provide full materials and support via processes drawing on evidence review, a survey and PPIE. Although not all PPIE suggestions could be acted upon, PPIE proved valuable in ensuring the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention in primary schools. Future work will include a pilot trial to assess whether progression to a full trial is justified. Study registration ISRCTN10215449 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10215449.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.