ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Biomarker-based depression risk prediction in chronic heart failure patients: an interpretable machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is frequently complicated by depression, which worsens prognosis but remains underdiagnosed due to symptom overlap and a lack of objective screening tools. Although biomarkers reflecting lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, inflammation, and neuro-immuno-endocrine imbalance have been implicated in both CHF and depression, their predictive value for psychiatric outcomes in CHF patients is unclear. Aim: This study aimed to develop and validate interpretable machine learning (ML) models for predicting depression risk in CHF patients via the use of clinical and biomarker data. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 3, 110 CHF patients admitted between January 2015 and December 2024 at Guang'anmen Hospital. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory indicators, including apolipoprotein B (ApoB), the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, and a novel glycated TyG (gTyG) index, were collected. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to assess dose-response associations between biomarkers and depression. Eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated, with model interpretability assessed via SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP). Results: Among the 3, 110 patients, 37.3% had comorbid depression. Elevated ApoB and gTyG indices were strongly associated with depression risk in both the unadjusted and fully adjusted models (ApoB Q4 vs. Q1: OR 5.41, 95% CI 3.72-7.87; gTyG Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.88-4.41; both P < 0.001), demonstrating clear nonlinear dose-response relationships. The TyG index was associated with depression in the crude analyses but lost significance after adjustment. Among the ML models, the RF model achieved the best performance (AUC 0.933 in training, accuracy 0.814, sensitivity 0.939). SHAP analysis revealed that the ApoB and gTyG indices were the most influential predictors. A user-friendly web application was developed for individualized risk prediction. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the ApoB and gTyG index are robust biomarkers for predicting depression risk in CHF patients. The RF model provided the highest predictive accuracy and interpretability, highlighting its potential utility for early risk stratification and targeted intervention. The incorporation of these biomarkers into routine clinical practice may facilitate timely identification and management of depression in CHF patients, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.