Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Machine learning-based prediction of recurrent extrahepatic bile duct stones after common bile duct exploration: a comparative study of models and SHAP-driven interpretability analysis.

Yugang Cao, Xun Hu, Jun Guo, Tao Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yugang CaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital, Hubei Key Laboratory for Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Hubei Polytechnic University School of Medicine, Huangshi, Hubei, China.
Xun HuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital, Hubei Key Laboratory for Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Hubei Polytechnic University School of Medicine, Huangshi, Hubei, China.
Jun GuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital, Hubei Key Laboratory for Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Hubei Polytechnic University School of Medicine, Huangshi, Hubei, China.
Tao FangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital, Hubei Key Laboratory for Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Hubei Polytechnic University School of Medicine, Huangshi, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to construct and compare machine learning models for predicting recurrent extrahepatic bile duct stones after common bile duct exploration and to clarify the contribution of key risk factors using SHAP analysis, thereby providing a reliable tool for clinical risk assessment and intervention. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1,363 patients (2010-2024, Huangshi Central Hospital/Honghu People's Hospital) with extrahepatic bile duct stones (156 recurrent cases). LASSO regression selected 8 predictors; 9 machine learning models were built, evaluated by AUC, accuracy, etc., and SHAP interpreted the optimal model. Results: Random Forest (RF) performed best: training/validation/external cohort AUC 97.99%/93.66%/83.1%, accuracy 0.953/0.902/0.829. SHAP identified maximum stone diameter, common bile duct diameter, and direct bilirubin as top risks, with nonlinearity (stones >15 mm elevated risk) and synergistic interactions. Conclusion: Random Forest (RF) is confirmed as the most reliable tool for predicting recurrent extrahepatic bile duct stones post-common bile duct exploration, outperforming other models in generalization. SHAP analysis clarifies that max stone diameter, CBD diameter, and direct bilirubin (with nonlinear effects like stones >15 mm elevating risk) are key synergistic risks. This study enables personalized clinical risk assessment and targeted interventions to reduce postoperative recurrence.

Indexed as

common bile duct explorationkey risk factorsmachine learningrecurrent extrahepatic bile duct stonesSHAP-driven interpretability analysis

Identifiers

PMID41458514
PMCPMC12741112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.