SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical impact and disparities in mortality and antimicrobial resistance between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in cirrhotic abdominal infections: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world evidence on predictors of antimicrobial resistance among patients with chronic liver disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bacterial infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Shifts in pathogen distribution and the rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms complicate clinical management, yet the relative impact of Gram-negative versus Gram-positive infections remains uncertain. Objective: To compare the prevalence, mortality, and MDR rates between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial pathogens in cirrhotic abdominal infections. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched for studies published from January 2015 to December 2024. Eligible cohort studies included adult cirrhotic patients with documented bacterial infections and reported outcomes of infection distribution, mortality, or MDR rates. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using RevMan 5.4, with heterogeneity assessed by the Results: Five cohort studies involving 580 cirrhotic patients were included. Gram-negative bacteria were more prevalent than Gram-positive bacteria (risk difference 0.15, 95% CI 0.09-0.20; Conclusion: Gram-negative bacteria remain the most frequent causes of infection in cirrhosis and are associated with higher mortality and the rate of MDR when compared to Gram-positive pathogens. Subgroup results support an increase in the proportion of Gram-positive SBP, related to fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and invasive procedures. Gram-negative predominance is greater in SBP than non-SBP. ICU patients displayed a significant higher proportion of Gram-positive organisms and a higher risk of Gram-negative MDR, and reduced mortality differences in relationship with a prevalent ACLF/sepsis physiopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.