ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
The evolution and application of the medical evidence chain.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Since the advent of evidence-based medicine, the decision-making process in disease diagnosis and treatment has exhibited fundamental principles that align closely with the core tenets of evidence chain theory in the legal field. Based on this, this paper aims to explore the underlying logic and practical value of transferring evidence chain theory from law to medicine, focusing on its significance in enhancing the scientific rigor and standardization of clinical decision-making. Methods: Through systematic retrieval of existing literature in the fields of jurisprudence and medicine, this paper reviewed the theoretical evolution and practical applications of the evidence chain in jurisprudence, outlined the grading criteria for medical evidence, and elaborated on the construction methods and application examples of the integrated evidence chain and toxicological evidence chain. Results: The mutual corroboration among evidence materials significantly enhances the reliability and validity of conclusions. The theory of evidence chains plays a pivotal role in evaluating drug efficacy, elucidating toxicological mechanisms, optimizing clinical pathways, and designing high-quality clinical trials. Conclusion: The interdisciplinary application of the evidence chain theory contributes to advancing the standardization and normalization of evidence-based medical practice, thereby enhancing the quality of clinical decision-making and public health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.