ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A VSD-based framework for assessing climate justice in urban outdoor cooling spaces: a case study of Fuzhou, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extreme heat events intensify health risks among vulnerable populations, raising concerns regarding climate justice. However, most existing assessments remain at the citywide scale and seldom examine inequities across different types of outdoor cooling spaces. Methods: This study integrates the Exposure-Sensitivity-Adaptive Capacity (VSD) framework with the dimensions of distributive, recognition, and procedural justice to construct a climate justice assessment model. Outdoor cooling spaces were classified into linear and areal forms. Using Gulou District in Fuzhou as the case study, we developed a multi-source indicator system based on remote sensing imagery, street-view data, points of interest, and demographic statistics. The entropy weight method was used to determine indicator weights, and K-means clustering was applied to identify climate injustice space types. Results: The findings show that 37.18% of linear cooling spaces and 44.45% of areal cooling spaces face significant climate injustice risks. High-risk areas are concentrated in dense built-up zones, aging neighborhoods, and peripheral areas with limited public services. Cluster analysis identified three distinct deficit categories: distributional justice deficit, recognitional justice deficit, and systemic justice deficit, reflecting overlapping vulnerabilities and uneven adaptive capacities. Discussion: These results highlight the need for differentiated interventions to reduce spatial inequities. Key actions include enhancing shading along traffic corridors, improving service accessibility in aging neighborhoods, and strengthening adaptive resources in systemic deficit areas. The proposed framework offers an evidence base for equity-oriented urban governance and supports resilient urban planning and public health strategies under extreme heat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.