Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458434›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Administrative embedding and employee health protection in China.

Xiangxu Meng, Yue Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangxu MengBusiness School, Shandong University, Weihai, China.
Yue WangBusiness School, Shandong University, Weihai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the impact of public health shocks and administrative embedding on employee health protection in privately listed companies in the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets between 2011 and 2021, with a particular focus on the COVID-19 shock. Methods: This study uses the Difference-in-Differences methodology to examine the impact of administrative embedding on employee health protection in private enterprises following the COVID-19 shock. Results: Private enterprises with administrative embedding significantly enhanced employee health protection level after experiencing public health shock. The validity of the research conclusions is confirmed through parallel trend test, endogeneity treatment, and robustness checks. This effect is more pronounced in enterprises located in eastern regions, densely populated areas, and larger companies. Increasing attention to employee health protection plays a mediating role, while urban healthcare condition and social security level serve as positive moderating factors. Conclusion: Private enterprises should recognize the role of administrative embedding in enhancing governance, employee health protection, and social responsibility. Employee involvement is crucial in health policies, with the government encouraging participation through supportive measures. Balancing efficiency and avoiding excessive interference is key to promoting administrative embedding. In future public health crises, this mechanism can strengthen resilience by enabling quick policy support and effective resource mobilization.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational HealthPrivate SectorPublic HealthChinaHumansSARS-CoV-2administrative embeddingCOVID-19employee health protectionprivate enterprisespublic health shocks

Identifiers

PMID41458434
PMCPMC12738933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.