ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Experiences, perceptions and utilization of CareLine: an evaluation study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social isolation and loneliness significantly impact the physical and mental health of older adults. To address these issues, telephone-based care services such as CareLine, a 24/7 service in Singapore for seniors living alone, provide emotional support, social interaction, and emergency response. This study evaluates the utilization and experiences of CareLine users and providers to understand how effectively the service meets the needs of older adults. Methods: A mixed methods approach was used, combining a retrospective analysis of CareLine's call log dataset (November 2016 to January 2024) and in-depth interviews with users and staff. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and multivariable regression analyses to explore participant characteristics and engagement patterns. Qualitative data from 20 interviews were thematically analyzed to explore user and provider perspectives. Results: The call log data included 9,512 users, with 318,950 recorded calls over the study period. Most users were female (64.6%), Chinese (82.1%), and aged 80 years or older (33.2%). Call volume peaked during the COVID-19 pandemic, with social care and emotional support being the most common call topics. Male users, those not currently married, and individuals living alone were more likely to engage with the service. Frequent callers (1% of the users) contributed to 68.5% of the inbound call volume. Thematic analysis highlighted the value of cultural and linguistic compatibility in service delivery, but also pointed to operational challenges, particularly with staffing and call management. Conclusion: CareLine effectively provides social and emotional support to a vulnerable population of older adults, particularly those living alone. However, frequent callers and high call volumes during the pandemic have stretched the service's capacity, highlighting the need for targeted user engagement strategies, increased staffing, and resource optimization. The findings have important implications for the design and implementation of telephone-based care services for older adults globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.