Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458388›Full record

ArticleClinical hematology international2025

Real-world outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with prior proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide exposure: A single-center study in Sweden.

Vincent Luong, Muhammad Kashif, Katarina Uttervall, Anna Bohlin, Annette Öster Fernström, Ying Qu, Seina Lee, João Mendes, Sandra Van Hoorenbeeck, Eva Hellqvist Franck and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical hematology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vincent LuongDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9825-6706
Muhammad KashifDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katarina UttervallDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna BohlinDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annette Öster FernströmDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ying QuJanssen-Cilag, AB., Solna, Sweden.
Seina LeeJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Raritan, New Jersey, United States of America.
João MendesJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Raritan, New Jersey, United States of America.
Sandra Van HoorenbeeckJohnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Eva Hellqvist FranckJanssen-Cilag, AB., Solna, Sweden.
Jianming HeJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Raritan, New Jersey, United States of America.
Evren AliciDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan LundDepartment of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD) such as lenalidomide (Len) in early lines of therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) has resulted in a high proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) being Len-refractory. Len refractoriness is associated with inferior outcomes, constituting an unmet need in clinical practice. This retrospective single-center study aimed to provide real-world characteristics and outcomes in RRMM previously exposed to PI and Len during 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), stratified by Len refractoriness. RRMM patients between Jan 2017 and May 2023 were included. We studied clinical characteristics, treatments and survival outcomes. A total of 218 patients were included (n=85 Len refractory). The median progression-free survival was 13.6 months in Len-refractory versus 14.9 months in Len non-refractory patients. The median overall survival was 20.3 months in Len refractory, and not reached in Len non-refractory patients. The overall response rates to the subsequent LOT were 58.8% and 61.7% in Len refractory and non-refractory cohorts, respectively. IMiD-based and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-containing regimens were the most frequent subsequent LOT, 44% and 41%, respectively. This study shows suboptimal outcomes in Len refractory RRMM patients, highlighting the need to develop effective treatment options.

Indexed as

multiple myelomareal-worldrelapsed/refractorytreatment outcomestreatment sequence

Identifiers

PMID41458388
PMCPMC12739867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.