ArticleClinical hematology international2025
Real-world outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with prior proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide exposure: A single-center study in Sweden.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD) such as lenalidomide (Len) in early lines of therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) has resulted in a high proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) being Len-refractory. Len refractoriness is associated with inferior outcomes, constituting an unmet need in clinical practice. This retrospective single-center study aimed to provide real-world characteristics and outcomes in RRMM previously exposed to PI and Len during 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), stratified by Len refractoriness. RRMM patients between Jan 2017 and May 2023 were included. We studied clinical characteristics, treatments and survival outcomes. A total of 218 patients were included (n=85 Len refractory). The median progression-free survival was 13.6 months in Len-refractory versus 14.9 months in Len non-refractory patients. The median overall survival was 20.3 months in Len refractory, and not reached in Len non-refractory patients. The overall response rates to the subsequent LOT were 58.8% and 61.7% in Len refractory and non-refractory cohorts, respectively. IMiD-based and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-containing regimens were the most frequent subsequent LOT, 44% and 41%, respectively. This study shows suboptimal outcomes in Len refractory RRMM patients, highlighting the need to develop effective treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.