Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458339›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Acute Pancreatitis Management and Scoring in the Department of General Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, 2022-2024.

Bakhtawar Awan, Mohamed Elsaigh, Josef Watfah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bakhtawar AwanGeneral Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London, GBR.
Mohamed ElsaighGeneral and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London, GBR.
Josef WatfahGeneral Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAcute pancreatitis is a common cause of acute abdominal admissions, which usually resolve on their own; however, early severity stratification guides escalation of care and resource utilization. Early and accurate severity assessment using standardized scoring systems, such as the modified Atlanta classification, is crucial for effective clinical management and improved outcomes in patients with pancreatitis. Therefore, we conducted this clinical audit to highlight the use of the Atlanta scoring system. We designed this closed-loop audit to bridge the gap between national recommendations and clinical practice, with a focus on improving early risk stratification and patient management for acute pancreatitis at Northwick Park Hospital.

methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis conducted at Northwick Park Hospital, Department of General Surgery. Our audit was done over two separate cycles. The first cycle included 64 patients in 2023 from Epro and Cerner, while the second cycle included 80 patients in 2024 from Cerner. Between the two cycles, several interventions were introduced, including departmental teaching, visual prompts such as posters, and digital communications via email and messaging platforms. Scoring practices included the modified Atlanta score, the Modified Marshall scoring system, and the Glasgow-Imrie score. The audit was conducted in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG104 guidelines and was approved through local clinical governance meetings for both audit cycles, with the consultant's agreement to implement updated scoring protocols.

resultsThe first audit cycle in 2023 revealed that only 30% of patients had documented scoring on admission, and none had repeated scoring at 48 hours. The second cycle in 2024 demonstrated improvement, with admission scores increasing from 30% to 40%. Atlanta classification scoring on admission and 48 hours post-admission increased from 0% in the first cycle to 7.5% in the second cycle.

conclusionThis quality improvement initiative demonstrated that targeted interventions significantly enhance adherence to national scoring protocols, thereby improving standardized acute pancreatitis care. However, continuous attention must be paid to assess and improve the use of severity scoring systems in the management of acute pancreatitis, in addition to increasing the frequency and consistency of applying the Revised Atlanta Classification at the time of admission and 48 hours post-admission.

Indexed as

atlantaglasgowmarshall universitypancreatitisquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID41458339
PMCPMC12743429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.