ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Identifying and characterizing clinical subgroups in individuals with endometriosis.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations Among Parental Rearing Patterns, Psychological Resilience and Coping Styles in Adolescent Females with Endometriosis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Classification attempts and treatment strategies for endometriosis have been predominantly biomedical. Symptom profiles observed in individuals with endometriosis are multidimensional and may be more effectively captured by a biopsychosocial model. Methods: The aim of this study was to identify distinct subgroups of individuals with endometriosis based on their biopsychosocial profiles, using Latent Class Analysis. In a subsequent phase, the identified subgroups were compared in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and various indices of functioning. Results: Two distinct subgroups were identified: Class 2, representing a high biopsychosocial burden (BPS) group characterized by both significant psychological strain and severe pain characteristics, and Class 1, representing a low BPS group with low scores on these indicators. The high BPS group reported worse control/powerlessness and greater deficits in social support. Conclusion: Moving forward, clinical assessment of patients with endometriosis may benefit from integrating core principles from the biopsychosocial model. This approach can help identify individuals facing significant psychosocial challenges who may require multidisciplinary interventions alongside evidence-based biological treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.