ArticleBMJ public health2025
Pandemic risk-related behaviour change in England from June 2020 to March 2022: the cross-sectional REACT-1 study among over 2 million people.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine how people in England changed their infection risk-related behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic and in response to control measures, 19 June 2020 to 31 March 2022. Design: Over 18 (of 19) rounds, randomly selected participants across England completed a questionnaire about risk-related behaviours, sociodemographics and symptoms. Participants: Between 85 018 and 154 060 randomly selected participants per round, aged 5+ years, totalling 2 177 657 responses with relevant data. Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were self-reported shielding and/or taking specific precautions, not leaving home in the prior week, not being in close proximity with anyone outside their household the day before and wearing face coverings outside the home. Secondary community-level measures of mobility and public health policy stringency were compared with the primary outcomes to provide population-level context to the observed findings. Results: Infection risk-related behaviours varied considerably over the nearly 2 years under study. Protective behaviours peaked in January 2021, during England's winter wave, before widespread vaccination. At that time, the estimated proportion of self-reported shielding and/or taking specific precautions reached 21.6% (95% CI 21.4% to 21.8%), of self-reported not leaving home in the week prior to completing the questionnaire reached 7.99% (95% CI 7.85% to 8.13%) and of self-reported not having contact with anyone outside their household on the day before answering the questionnaire reached 89.2% (95% CI 89.1% to 89.4%). As self-reported vaccination rates increased and prevalence of infection decreased, protective behaviours decreased, although patterns varied by demographics. Protective behaviours were strongly correlated with community-level mobility data and the stringency of public health measures. Conclusions: Individual-based data showed sizeable proportions of people undertook protective behaviours during the pandemic, especially during the second lockdown in January 2021, although there was evidence of 'pandemic fatigue' in the study's later stages. Self-reported behaviours were closely aligned with community mobility data and the stringency of government policies, indicating policy-driven behavioural changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.