ArticleMethodsX2026
SatTCR: a pipeline for performing saturation analysis of the T cell receptor repertoire and a case study of a healthy canine.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Profiling the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to quantify adaptive immune responses has become common in human and animal research. Companion dogs with spontaneous tumors have similarities with humans who have cancer. T cells undergo clonal expansion when they recognize specific antigens via surface TCRs. TCR counts from NGS data provide a way to quantify T cell response to vaccines, cancer, or infectious diseases for preclinical and clinical health studies. One complication is that the power and accuracy of TCR experiments depend substantially on the TCR sequencing depth, therefore it is important to determine the optimal read depth of an experiment to verify whether a subject's repertoire is correctly represented. Results: The optimal TCR sequencing depth for future experiments can be determined by randomly sampling lower TCR sequencing depths from a sequencing experiment, assembling the TCR clonotypes, and determining where the saturation of power and accuracy occurs. Moreover, one can determine whether an existing experiment has sufficient sequencing depth to justify its conclusions. We provide guidelines to determine whether the sequencing depth is adequate and a computational pipeline that:Samples pairs of sequences and assembles clonotypesSummarizes the results in a parametrized report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.