ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Geometric evaluation of a deep learning method for segmentation of urinary OARs on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While urinary organs at risk (OARs) such as the intraprostatic urethra and the bladder trigone are increasingly recognized as associated with severe genitourinary toxicity, their delineation in clinical practice is time consuming and probably associated with a large interobserver variability. The aim of this study was to propose a magnetic resonance (MR) deep learning segmentation of urinary OARs for prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy (RT), based on a validated atlas. Material and methods: In this multicentric study, a convolutional neural network (CNN) for image segmentation (nnU-Net) was trained and validated on three image datasets. Two datasets came from MR-linac devices (Unity®, Elekta and MRIdian®, Viewray), and one dataset came from the PROSTATEx database (MAGNETOM® Trio and Skyra, Siemens). Evaluation of the deep learning segmentation was performed using dice score coefficients (DSC), surface distance (SD) and Hausdorff distance. Results: A total of 265 MRI were analyzed. The mean DSC for all urinary structures was 0.88. The automatic segmentation model proved to be effective in the segmentation of the target volume and large OARs such as the bladder (mean DSC ranging of 0.95). Regarding urinary OARs, the mean DSC ranged between 0.50 and 0.68. The Hausdorff distance ranged between 4.0 mm to 10.3 mm for urinary OARs, highlighting local mismatches caused by large anatomical variations between patients. However, the SD ranged between 1.0 mm and 1.3 mm for urinary OARs, highlighting an overall good surface correlation for all organs. Conclusion: This multicentric study is the first to propose a nnU-Net deep learning model for the delineation of urinary OARs, that can be applied to various image dataset. Further work is needed to assess the dosimetric impact of such variations, in various clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.