ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
A predictive model for multimodal rehabilitation efficacy in post-stroke patients with lower limb motor impairment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the feasibility and clinical value of constructing a therapeutic efficacy prediction model for patients with lower limb motor dysfunction after stroke who received conventional treatment combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES) mirror therapy training, based on age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, baseline FMA score, FES stimulation intensity, FES stimulation frequency, and mirror therapy training duration. Methods: A total of 510 patients with lower limb motor dysfunction after stroke admitted to the hospital from January 2022 to October 2024 were selected and divided into a training set ( Results: The effective treatment rate was 65.83% (235/357) in the training set and 64.05% (98/153) in the validation set. Multivariate regression showed that age, baseline NIHSS score, baseline FMA score, FES stimulation intensity, FES stimulation frequency, and mirror therapy training duration were independent influencing factors (All Conclusion: The Nomogram model constructed based on the above indicators can effectively predict the therapeutic efficacy of patients with lower limb motor dysfunction after stroke, providing a basis for clinical individualized intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.