ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Recent developments in bibliotherapy for adolescent depression.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review systematically examines the current research on bibliotherapy for adolescent depressive disorders, emphasizing its efficacy and potential as a non-pharmacological intervention, while also considering the variations across different types of bibliotherapy and inherent limitations of the intervention itself. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to explore the therapeutic mechanisms of bibliotherapy-including emotional resonance, cognitive restructuring, and social support-and to analyze various application models, such as guided versus unguided formats, creative versus self-help bibliotherapy, group reading, individualized interventions, and emerging digital approaches. Results: Evidence indicates that bibliotherapy can effectively reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents across diverse intervention strategies. Both creative and self-help bibliotherapy, as well as group-based and individualized formats, have shown promising outcomes, particularly when integrated with structured discussion or other therapeutic approaches like CBT and mindfulness. However, the intervention's effectiveness can be moderated by factors such as text selection, reader characteristics, and cultural context. Potential limitations include emotional triggering from certain narratives, variability in individual engagement, and inconsistent long-term efficacy, especially among adolescents. Existing studies are further constrained by small sample sizes, brief intervention periods, and a lack of standardized material selection criteria. Conclusion: Bibliotherapy represents a valuable, accessible intervention for adolescent depression, yet its application requires careful implementation to mitigate potential drawbacks. Future research should focus on large-scale, multicenter trials, further investigation of neuroscientific mechanisms, development of personalized reading programs, establishment of practitioner training systems, and cross-cultural adaptation. Efforts should also address ethical and privacy concerns, particularly within digital platforms, and explore creative integration with complementary therapeutic methods to enhance overall efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.