ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Deep cervical lymphaticovenous anastomosis for Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker Based ARIA Stress Test: A Proposed Conceptual Framework for Dynamic Biomarker-Guided ARIA Risk Stratification in Anti-Amyloid Immunotherapy for Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
- Reconstructing cerebral lymphatic clearance: an emerging target in the Alzheimer's disease therapeutic pipeline.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Possible Impact of Lymphatic Drainage on Brain Injury After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Brain Extracellular Space: From an Overlooked Dimension to Catalyst of a Novel Neuroscience Paradigm.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Deep cervical lymphaticovenous anastomosis for Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder with limited treatment options. Recent discoveries of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatic vessels (MLVs) have highlighted their critical role in clearing metabolic waste-including amyloid beta and tau proteins-from the brain. Dysfunction of these systems contributes to AD pathogenesis by impairing the clearance of neurotoxic proteins. Deep cervical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (dcLVA) is an innovative microsurgical technique designed to enhance cerebral waste drainage by anastomosing deep cervical lymphatic channels to adjacent veins. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanisms, applications, and emerging perspectives of dcLVA for AD. Early studies suggest potential short-term improvements in cognitive scores and neuroimaging biomarkers after surgery, with an acceptable safety profile. However, the evidence is limited to small prospective cohorts and case reports, underscoring the need for larger, randomized controlled trials to validate its efficacy and long-term benefits. dcLVA represents a promising surgical intervention for select patients, particularly those with moderate-to-severe AD who have failed conventional pharmacotherapy, but it requires careful patient selection and further investigation. HIGHLIGHTS: This review proposes deep cervical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (dcLVA) as a mechanism driven surgery that may enhance clearance of amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau through the brain, meningeal, and deep cervical drainage pathways. Early human evidence from a single arm cohort and case reports suggests short term cognitive and imaging signals with acceptable perioperative safety. dcLVA is not recommended as a first line option for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) and may be considered for moderate to severe AD or for patients who are refractory to pharmacotherapy and have objective evidence of drainage impairment. Standardized patient selection and longitudinal imaging and biomarker monitoring are recommended, including Aβ and tau positron emission tomography (PET), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis along the perivascular space, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or plasma panels. Systemic safety remains an important uncertainty, and future trials should include longitudinal surveillance of hepatic, renal, and hematologic function. Multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are urgently needed with 12 month Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR SB) as a primary endpoint, transparent reporting, and evaluation of combination strategies with anti Aβ therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.