Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41457941›Full record

ReviewCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026

Treatment of Coronary Perforation in a Bifurcation: Two-Stent Strategies With Fenestrated Covered Stents.

Jakob U Lindner, Janine Pöss, Holger Thiele, Dmitry S Sulimov

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob U LindnerDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2015-968X
Janine PössDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0169-998X
Dmitry S SulimovDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary perforations are a dreaded complication for any interventional cardiologist. The treatment of this complication is exceptionally difficult when it occurs in a coronary bifurcation. While a conservative approach or a balloon occlusion might be sufficient in some cases, additional treatment is sometimes necessary. Here, we present two cases, where complex two-stent strategies with covered stents were necessary to successfully treat the bleeding. The aim is to discuss the feasibility of this method, while also analyzing published cases where fenestration of a covered coronary stent was successfully performed. The commonly used material is discussed, including its capabilities and limitations. With the proper knowledge about the different treatment options and the required material readily available, this difficult complication can be successfully treated in the catheterization laboratory.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary VesselsHeart InjuriesPercutaneous Coronary InterventionStentsVascular System InjuriesAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignTreatment Outcomebifurcationcoronary perforationcovered stentspercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Identifiers

PMID41457941
PMCPMC12953196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.