ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2025
The Mediating Role of the Primary Emotional Systems and Rumination on the Relationship Between Resilience and Perceived Stress.
Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the potential mediating influence of primary emotional systems and rumination on the relationship between resilience and perceived stress.
methodA sample of 503 undergraduate students completed a selfreport battery including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), the Ruminative Responses Scale–Brief Form (RRS-BF), and the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scale (ANPS). Common method bias was assessed and found not to be a significant concern. Hypothesized relationships and indirect effects were tested using path analysis and mediation analysis (bootstrapping), with model fit assessed via CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and BIC indices.
resultsThe final model, controlling for gender and age, demonstrated good fit (χ²/df = 2.91, RMSEA = 0.068, TLI = 0.963, CFI = 0.998). Resilience was negatively associated with the FEAR, SADNESS, and ANGER systems, brooding, and perceived stress (all p<0.001). FEAR and SADNESS were positively associated with brooding and perceived stress. Brooding was positively associated with perceived stress. Bootstrap analyses confirmed significant indirect effects of resilience on perceived stress through FEAR, SADNESS, ANGER, and brooding (β= -0.253, p = 0.011).
conclusionResilience capacity may influence stress evaluation through its relationship with primary emotional systems and rumination. These findings suggest that interactions between subcortical emotional mechanisms and cortical processes play a role in stress perception. Further research should investigate negative primary emotional systems as potential neuromodulation targets in stress processing Keywords: Affective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.