ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Discrimination of benign and malignant non-mass breast lesions using ultrasound radiomics with machine learning models.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Ultrasound Research on Non-Mass Breast Lesions: Definition, Classification, and Differential Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Discrimination of benign and malignant non-mass breast lesions using ultrasound radiomics with machine learning models.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to enhance the preoperative diagnosis of non-mass breast lesions (NMLs) by validating radiomics-based machine learning models and assessing their performance alone and in combination with clinical ultrasound features to distinguish benign from malignant lesions.
methodsA total of 123 NMLs from 119 patients with confirmed pathology were analyzed. Patients were split into a training cohort (n = 98) and a validation cohort (n = 25). From each ultrasound image, 1558 radiomics features were extracted. After dimensionality reduction and feature selection, 10 key features were retained. Predictive models were developed using logistic regression (LR), linear regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forests, Extremely Randomized Trees (Extra Trees), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). A clinical model was built using LR based on ultrasound findings such as calcification, high resistance index, and axillary lymph node enlargement. A combined model incorporated both radiomics and clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe LightGBM model achieved the highest radiomics-only performance (AUC: 0.932 training; 0.867 validation). The clinical model achieved AUCs of 0.837 (training) and 0.790 (validation). The combined model outperformed both, with AUCs of 0.973 (training) and 0.933 (validation), and showed superior clinical benefit in DCA.
conclusionsCombining radiomics with clinical ultrasound data significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for NMLs, supporting better differentiation between benign and malignant lesions and aiding clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.