Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41457850›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2026

3D-Printed Cut Guides and Custom Prostheses for Pelvic Reconstruction in Bone Sarcoma Patients: Complications, Survival Rates, and Functional Outcomes.

Luca Cevolani, Benedetta Spazzoli, Eric Lodewijk Staals, Costantino Errani, Laura Campanacci, Paolo Spinnato, Massimiliano De Paolis, Giuseppe Bianchi, Davide Maria Donati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luca CevolaniUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-1034
Benedetta SpazzoliUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Eric Lodewijk StaalsUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Costantino ErraniUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-2867
Laura CampanacciUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo SpinnatoDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-3215
Massimiliano De PaolisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe BianchiUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Davide Maria DonatiUnit of 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9170-0576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPelvic reconstruction following bone sarcoma resection presents significant challenges. This study evaluates the outcomes of using 3D-printed custom-made prostheses and cutting guides to improve surgical precision and functional results in periacetabular reconstructions. Therefore, in this study, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of reoperation for any reason following pelvic resection and reconstruction with a custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis involving the acetabulum in patients with primary bone sarcoma, and what factors contribute to an increased risk of reconstruction failure? (2) Does the use of 3D custom-made cutting guides, combined with a 3D custom-made hemipelvis prosthesis, ensure the attainment of safe resection margins and allow for anatomical reconstruction with optimal fit at the bone-prosthesis interface? (3) What were the observed outcome scores as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score? Additionally, how do the type of resection and the volume of the primary bone sarcoma affect the outcomes in relation to the type of reconstruction? MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 24 patients treated for primary bone sarcomas at our institution from January 2013 to December 2023. Each patient received a 3D-printed cutting guide and a 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis tailored to their specific anatomical needs, based on high-resolution imaging and computer-aided design.

resultsThe use of custom-made 3D prostheses resulted in a reoperation rate of 46%, primarily due to complications such as infection and mechanical failures. Specific complications included an 8% rate of deep infections and mechanical issues like aseptic loosening. Local recurrence was observed in 5 patients (21%) at a median time of 5 months post-surgery. Despite these challenges, the average MSTS score was 83.7%, indicating a high level of functional recovery post-surgery.

conclusionsThe integration of 3D printing in pelvic reconstructions for bone sarcomas significantly enhances anatomical and functional outcomes. However, the technology demands further refinement to reduce complication rates. Continued advancements in 3D-printing materials and techniques are crucial to maximizing the benefits of this innovative approach in orthopedic oncology.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaPelvic BonesPlastic Surgery ProceduresPrinting, Three-DimensionalProsthesis DesignSarcomaAcetabulumAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged3D‐printed custom‐made cut guide3D‐printed custom‐made prosthesisbone sarcomapelvic reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41457850
PMCPMC12862436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.