ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2026
3D-Printed Cut Guides and Custom Prostheses for Pelvic Reconstruction in Bone Sarcoma Patients: Complications, Survival Rates, and Functional Outcomes.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPelvic reconstruction following bone sarcoma resection presents significant challenges. This study evaluates the outcomes of using 3D-printed custom-made prostheses and cutting guides to improve surgical precision and functional results in periacetabular reconstructions. Therefore, in this study, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of reoperation for any reason following pelvic resection and reconstruction with a custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis involving the acetabulum in patients with primary bone sarcoma, and what factors contribute to an increased risk of reconstruction failure? (2) Does the use of 3D custom-made cutting guides, combined with a 3D custom-made hemipelvis prosthesis, ensure the attainment of safe resection margins and allow for anatomical reconstruction with optimal fit at the bone-prosthesis interface? (3) What were the observed outcome scores as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score? Additionally, how do the type of resection and the volume of the primary bone sarcoma affect the outcomes in relation to the type of reconstruction? MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 24 patients treated for primary bone sarcomas at our institution from January 2013 to December 2023. Each patient received a 3D-printed cutting guide and a 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis tailored to their specific anatomical needs, based on high-resolution imaging and computer-aided design.
resultsThe use of custom-made 3D prostheses resulted in a reoperation rate of 46%, primarily due to complications such as infection and mechanical failures. Specific complications included an 8% rate of deep infections and mechanical issues like aseptic loosening. Local recurrence was observed in 5 patients (21%) at a median time of 5 months post-surgery. Despite these challenges, the average MSTS score was 83.7%, indicating a high level of functional recovery post-surgery.
conclusionsThe integration of 3D printing in pelvic reconstructions for bone sarcomas significantly enhances anatomical and functional outcomes. However, the technology demands further refinement to reduce complication rates. Continued advancements in 3D-printing materials and techniques are crucial to maximizing the benefits of this innovative approach in orthopedic oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.