Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41457812›Full record

ArticleSocial studies of science2026

The Cruel Optimism of Plastics: Promissory Technologies and the Temporalities of Inaction.

Gauri Pathak, Saskia Abrahms-Kavunenko, Mark Nichter

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Social studies of science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gauri PathakDepartment of Global Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3244-0372
Saskia Abrahms-KavunenkoHakubi Center for Advanced Research and the Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-3282
Mark NichterSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plastic problem is a complex, multi-faceted issue that requires coordinated global action and systemic change to address. In this article, we investigate how what we call 'promissory technologies' affect people's capacities to understand the systemic changes necessary to significantly reduce global dependencies upon plastics. Engaging with Lauren Berlant's conceptualizations of 'cruel optimism' and 'technologies of patience' we delineate three overarching (and sometimes overlapping) forms of promissory technologies related to plastics and the temporalities associated with them: 1) technologies of patience, 2) technologies of deflection, and 3) technologies of salvation. We argue that these technologies enable unabated attachments to plastics even as the harms of these attachments become ever-more abundant and evident.

Indexed as

OptimismPlasticsTechnologyHumansPlasticsAnthropocenecruel optimismplasticspromissory technologiessociotechnical imaginaries

Identifiers

PMID41457812
PMCPMC13050395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.