ArticleJournal of occupational health2026
Occupational physicians' practices in supporting employees with long COVID: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Journal of occupational health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study examined the support provided by occupational physicians (OPs) in Japan to employees with long COVID, a condition that significantly affected workforce health during the pandemic.
methodsAn exploratory cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed, consisting of qualitative interviews followed by a questionnaire survey targeting OPs certified by the Japan Society for Occupational Health. The interviews explored actual experiences of supporting workers with long COVID, and the findings were used to develop the questionnaire. The survey and interview findings were integrated to describe overall occupational health (OH) practices.
resultsTwenty OPs reported 30 cases of employees with long COVID in the interviews. Based on these findings, a questionnaire survey was conducted, yielding 182 valid responses. The integrated results showed that OPs most frequently reported "Main OH responses" such as active listening, return-to-work assistance, and lifestyle guidance. Measures such as explaining workers' compensation applications and preparing lists of outpatient clinics were less frequently reported. For "Advice for employers," limitation of overtime, reduction of workload, and telework were commonly reported, whereas demotion and reassignment were rarely reported.
conclusionsThis study clarified how OPs in Japan supported workers with long COVID through diverse, context-dependent practices. The identified main OH responses and advice for employers provide a framework for understanding current practices. Developing practical case examples, structured assessment tools, and workplace guidelines, together with further research grounded in real-world practice, will enhance OPs' ability to provide appropriate support and strengthen preparedness for future health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.