ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2026
Low Incidence of Adverse Events of a Novel Self-Tensioning No. 2 Round Suture in Rotator Cuff Repair: An IDEAL Stage 2a Registry Cohort Analysis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite technical and material improvements in rotator cuff repair, clinical and radiological failure remains common. Following suture fixation, tension and footprint compression decrease from time zero. A novel suture has been designed to shorten when submerged in liquid to maintain tension and increase repair construct security. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and clinical outcomes (IDEAL 2a assessment) in patients receiving rotator cuff repair with the self-tensioning suture with a minimum of 12 months follow up. Clinical registries allow early identification of outlier or poorly performing prosthesis with prevention of avoidable complications.
methodsA cohort analysis was performed utilizing patients from the PRULO (Patient Reported Outcomes in Upper Limb Surgery) registry. All patients with the suture of interest who underwent a rotator cuff repair with 12 months follow up were included. Results included patient reported outcome scores: Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and complications. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed using multiple imputation and a linear model to assess changes over 12 months follow up.
resultsA cohort of 255 patients was included for analysis. At 12 months follow up, median scores for QuickDASH decreased by 36 and WORC increased by 41, both of which surpass the minimum clinically important difference. Our observed rates of complications included: Infection 2.4%, stiffness/capsulitis 13%, and retear 12%. Complication rates and functional improvements were similar to other studies. These results suggest the suture is safe and adequately effective for ongoing clinical use and further study.
conclusionThe novel suture demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy profiles, with outcomes similar to those published in the literature. This study suggests this novel suture is safe and does not seem to produce unique complications. Further research is warranted to specifically investigate clinical efficacy in the longer term.
trial registrationACTRN12619000770167.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.