Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41457756›Full record

ArticleAcute and critical care2026

Nurse-led glycemic control protocols in intensive care units: a scoping review.

Eugene Han, Eunhye Park, Eui Geum Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eugene HanYonsei University College of Nursing and Intensive Care Unit, Division of Nursing, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.
Eunhye ParkYonsei University College of Nursing and Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Nursing, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.
Eui Geum OhYonsei University College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurse-led glycemic management in critical care settings has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of dysglycemia, including hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, while stabilizing glycemic variability, contributing to enhanced patient outcomes. This scoping review aimed to identify nurse-led glycemic management protocols in intensive care units, analyze their components (e.g., target glucose range, monitoring frequency, and implementation methods), and evaluate their effectiveness. Seven databases, including PubMed and CINAHL, were searched for studies published between January 2015 and April 2025. Studies were selected using predefined inclusion criteria, and two independent reviewers evaluated methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tool. Ultimately, seven quasi-experimental studies were included. Most protocols employed continuous intravenous insulin infusions (n=5), whereas others focused on hypoglycemia management (n=2). The target glucose levels ranged from 100-180 mg/dl, and the monitoring intervals varied from 15 minutes to 4 hours depending on the protocol type. All protocols excluded patients on oral diets and those receiving intermittent enteral nutrition. Four studies used printed guidelines with manual adjustments, whereas three employed computerized decision-support systems. The studies indicated that nurse-led glycemic control management was associated with reductions in both glycemic variability and in the incidence of hyper- and hypoglycemia. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based updates to nurse-led glycemic control protocols in critical care for safe and effective management through a multidisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

glycemic controlintensive care unitsnurse

Identifiers

PMID41457756
PMCPMC12989951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.