ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Genetic analysis of fetal skeletal dysplasia via whole exome sequencing and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of hypochondroplasia: international Delphi consensus recommendations.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFetal skeletal dysplasia (SD) is a complex group of bone and cartilage with high genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic diversity. Our study aimed to identify the genetic causes of fetal SD, provide an accurate prenatal diagnosis for those families investigate non-invasive prenatal detection strategy, and facilitate clinical diagnosis of fetal SD. MATERIALS AND
methodsA Total 34 fetuses with SD were recruited and analyzed using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES). Moreover, a non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) using circulating fetal DNA in maternal plasma was performed on 5 SD fetuses.
resultsA Total 55.88% (19/34) fetueses with SD were identified with the genetic etiologies. A Total 27 cases underwent karyotype and CMA analysis, and the diagnostic rate was 3.70% (1/27), while 34 cases accepted WES, and the diagnostic rate was 55.88% (19/34). Of the 19 positive cases, 2 cases were identified with pathogenic CNVs (10.53%, 2/19), and the other 17 cases were identified with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variations (89.47%, 17/19). The FGFR3 was the most prevalent SD-causing gene (47.06%, 8/17). In addition, 5 cases accepted the NIPD based on NGS for the detection of fetal SD, and the results were all consistent with those of amniocentesis.
conclusionsOur study highlights the advantages of WES compared with CMA in genetic diagnosis in fetal SD. Furthermore, our study revealed the excellent detection efficiency of NIPD based on NGS, which may be a potential noninvasive detection method in fetal SD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.