Trial reportWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2025
The Effects of a Technology-Assisted Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (TecHCR) Program for Adults With Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04862351 (Effectiveness of Technology-assisted Interventions in Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Technology-assisted Interventions in Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (TechCR) Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effects of a Technology-Assisted Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (TecHCR) Program for Adults With Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTechnology-assisted interventions offer a promising alternative to conventional cardiac rehabilitation. However, there is limited evidence on their effectiveness, particularly in non-Western settings with emphasis on exercise self-efficacy.
aimsTo evaluate the effects of a 12-week, technology-assisted hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (TecHCR) program on physical, physiological, and psychological outcomes of patients with coronary heart disease.
methodsA two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial including 160 participants was randomly assigned to either TecHCR or usual care. TecHCR was underpinned by the Health Belief Model, consisting of three supervised exercise training and occupational therapy sessions, a fitness watch for exercise self-monitoring, six audio-visual educational videos, and a weekly video call follow-up. Data were collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 24 weeks post-intervention.
resultsParticipants in TecHCR demonstrated significantly greater improvement in exercise self-efficacy (β = 5.909, 95% CI [3.146, 8.672]; p < 0.001), health-promoting behaviors (β = 9.058, 95% CI [5.524, 12.591]; p < 0.001), and perceived anxiety levels (β = -1.255, 95% CI [-1.893, -0.616]; p < 0.001) at immediate post-intervention and (β = 8.506, 95% CI [4.951, 12.061]; p < 0.001, β = 14.563, 95% CI [8.809, 20.317]; p < 0.001, β = -1.145, 95% CI [-1.975, -0.315]; p = 0.007, respectively) 24 weeks post-intervention when compared with the control group. No statistically significant improvements were observed in perceived depression and cardiovascular risk factors. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The TecHCR program, combining supervised sessions with technology-assisted components, is an effective approach for significantly improving exercise self-efficacy, health-promoting behaviors, and anxiety in patients with coronary heart disease. Healthcare institutions should consider implementing hybrid programs to overcome barriers to traditional cardiac rehabilitation, leveraging technology to extend support and maintain patient engagement beyond supervised sessions.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04862351.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.