ArticleBMC oral health2025
Evaluation of a YOLOv5x-based deep learning model for interproximal caries segmentation on bitewing radiographs across primary and permanent teeth.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a YOLOv5x-based instance segmentation model for automatic interproximal caries segmentation on bitewing radiographs across primary and permanent teeth and to summarize performance using clinically interpretable metrics.
methodsThe current research had a retrospective study design. 1000 primary teeth and 1000 permanent teeth bitewing radiographs were analysed for interproximal caries, which were marked using polygonal segmentation in the Craniocatch labelling module, resulting in a total of 5704 caries lesions being annotated. The images were divided into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing, and the Yolov5x model was trained in the PyTorch environment. Performance was reported using metrics such as confusion matrix, precision, recall, F1 score and ROC-AUC.
resultsPrecision value in the test dataset of primary tooth radiographs was determined as 0.80, recall as 0.78, F1 score as 0.79 and ROC-AUC as 0.87. In the permanent tooth group, precision was 0.78, recall 0.75, F1 score 0.76 and ROC-AUC value 0.76.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of the study, confusion matrices of primary and permanent tooth radiographs showed that the false positive and false negative rates were at acceptable levels. Yolov5x model is considered to have potential for use in children as a diagnostic tool, treatment planning, and clinical decision support system. However, the single-centre study design and the training process based solely on radiographic images may limit generalisability. Therefore, future studies with multi-centre, age-balanced, and multimodal data, including external validation, are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.