ArticleScientific reports2025
Kinetic and isotherm study of Ni-MOF/Magnetite nanoparticles adsorption capacity as green synthesized adsorbent towards rhodochrome (Kammererite).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthesis of Ce-MOF/Ag composites with improved electrocatalytic activity and stability for sustainable water splitting.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular adsorption mechanism of methylene blue dye on ulexite.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel approach by batch adsorption method for the removal of Rhodochrome (Kammererite) from wastewater via a sustainable, environmentally friendly, natural-dependent synthesis to produce Ni/MOF/tea-magnetite nanoparticles as adsorbent. No approach for the elimination of this category of chlorite was discussed using the adsorption batch method, which is highly efficient in relation to cost and time, as well as being rapid and environmentally benign. The study will also consider pH, nanoparticle dose, dye concentration, agitation speed, temperature, and contact time to evaluate how this influence removal efficiency, as well as isotherms, kinetics, and nanoparticle reusability as a cost-saving strategy. The morphology and microstructure of the adsorbent material were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis, zeta potential measurement, and X-ray diffraction (XRD).The optimum removal parameters were pH 8, a duration of 5 min at 600 rpm, and 0.07 g of nanoparticles, resulting in a clearance rate of 93%. Moreover, it was shown that the material may be utilized for three cycles with a clearing rate of 85%. The adsorption process can be conducted without modifying the temperature. The adsorption isotherm and kinetics studied was evaluated using the different kinetics study, Langmuir, Freundlich, DKR, and Temkin models. The removal procedure was determined to comply with the Temkin model and pseudo second order reaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.