ArticleScientific reports2025
DA
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving distributed learning paradigm by enabling model training without direct access to raw data. However, FL remains vulnerable to unauthorized access during training and client-server exchanges. Authentication and key agreement are essential to restrict access to legitimate participants. Existing FL authentication schemes are prone to impersonation risks, centralized PKI fragility, and insufficient integrity guarantees. To address these challenges, we propose DA[Formula: see text]4FL, a robust dynamic accumulator-based authentication and key agreement with preserving data integrity for FL. Specifically, our proposed DA[Formula: see text]4FL is an efficient authentication protocol utilizing dynamic accumulators, blockchain technology, and message authentication codes, which ensures robust member management, authorized access, and data integrity. Security analysis against the eCK adversary model confirms the resilience of our protocol. Furthermore, experiments and performance evaluations show the effectiveness of our method, with computational overhead competitive with current state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.