Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41457143›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Speech processing in noise and the ability to differentiate sounds by musicians and nonmusicians.

XingXuan Fang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

XingXuan FangHubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, China. shawn1524@hbust.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the perception and processing of speech in noise among musicians and nonmusicians. The study included 60 participants, ages 25-35, divided equally between musicians with formal training and nonmusicians without structured musical experience. Participants' hearing levels were assessed through pure tone audiometry to confirm normal hearing function. During the study, all participants were required to listen to audio recordings with articulation tables overlaid with white noise. The results showed that the Articulation Index (AI) for recognizing stop consonants was 8.0 out of 10 for musicians and 6.5 for nonmusicians. A 0-10 scale was used to determine the AI score values, which were 7.5 for musicians and 6.0 for nonmusicians. Higher scores on this scale indicate better speech perception in noisy environments. It measures overall intelligibility. The final %ALcons for listening to stop consonants was 21% for musicians and 25% for nonmusicians. During listening to fricative consonants, this indicator was 33% for musicians and 37% for nonmusicians. These findings indicate that musicians demonstrate better speech perception in noise. While these results suggest potential applications of musical training for auditory rehabilitation (e.g., in cases like Wernicke's aphasia), further longitudinal research is required to establish causation.

Indexed as

MusicNoisePerceptual MaskingPhoneticsSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAdultAudiometry, Pure-ToneFemaleHumansMaleAtop consonantConsonant perceptionFricative consonantMusical trainingMusicianSpeech-in-noise perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.