SynthesisCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Bilateral Cingulotomy as a Therapeutic Option for Intractable Cancer Pain: a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCingulotomy, a stereotactic neurosurgical procedure targeting the anterior cingulate cortex, has been explored for various refractory pain and neuropsychiatric conditions. However, while prior reviews have largely focused on chronic non-cancer pain, there remains a significant knowledge gap regarding its role in managing intractable cancer-related pain. This systematic review therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral cingulotomy as a therapeutic option for cancer-associated pain, addressing a highly underexplored but clinically relevant area of neurosurgical palliation. RECENT
findingsA total of six studies were included, encompassing 172 patients with intractable or metastatic cancer pain who underwent bilateral cingulotomy. Procedures were performed using radiofrequency (RF) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)-based lesioning at temperatures of approximately 75-80 °C for 60-80 s. Across studies, pain reduction was observed in 60-80% of patients, with variability in long-term durability of relief. Despite differences in technique, lesion parameters, and assessment scales, cingulotomy consistently demonstrated clinically meaningful pain improvement with a low rate of transient cognitive or behavioral side effects. These findings suggest that RFA-guided cingulotomy provides more precise lesioning and better short-term efficacy compared with earlier mechanical or thermocoagulation methods. Bilateral cingulotomy appears to be a safe and promising neurosurgical intervention for patients with intractable cancer pain refractory to conventional therapies. Nevertheless, variations in lesion temperature, duration, and number across studies contribute to heterogeneity in reported outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing methodology, incorporating long-term neurocognitive monitoring, and expanding multicenter data to strengthen evidence for its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41457129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.