SynthesisCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Neural Modification To Treat Chronic Tendinopathy: Emerging Evidence and Opportunities for Pain Practitioners - A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis systematic review aims to evaluate procedural interventions for chronic tendinopathy, with a focus on neurogenic mechanisms such as nerve ingrowth and neovascularization. Tendinopathy affects both athletes and the general population significantly, with up to 45% of cases eventually requiring surgical intervention despite conventional treatments. Recent advances highlight neurogenic mechanisms, such as nociceptive and autonomic fiber proliferation, as central to the pathology of chronic tendon pain, shifting focus toward targeted procedural interventions. The present investigation evaluates the efficacy and safety of interventions targeting chronic tendon neurogenesis, considered to be a major regulator of chronic tendon pain. The study focuses on procedural treatments, encompassing both percutaneous and surgical approaches, to manage tendinopathy effectively. RECENT
findingsA systematic review included eleven clinical studies investigating interventions targeting nerve ingrowth, such as high-volume injections (HVIs; including high-volume distension injection [HVDI] and high-volume image-guided injection [HVIGI]), sclerosing injections, radiofrequency microtenotomy, minimally invasive stripping, electrocoagulation therapy, and surgical procedures. These studies demonstrated moderate methodological quality, with MINORS scores ranging from 10 to 13. The pooled analysis of outcomes showed a mean reduction in VAS pain scores of 33.15 mm (SD: 17.70 mm), indicating significant pain relief. Functional improvement was also notable, with a pooled mean change in VAS function scores of 29.28 mm (SD: 23.64 mm). In addition, the pooled mean improvement in VISA scores was 23.90 points (SD: 18.98 points), while the pooled mean change in disability levels was 3.20 (SD: 25.0), highlighting the positive impact of these interventions in reducing functional impairment. Collectively, these findings support the efficacy of procedural treatments targeting neurogenic mechanisms in the management of chronic tendinopathy. This review included eleven clinical studies evaluating six types of interventional procedures. Interventions focusing on nerve ingrowth mechanisms demonstrated promising outcomes for chronic tendinopathy, significantly reducing pain and enhancing functional capabilities. Despite promising results, the variability in study quality, particularly in blinding, underscores the need for more robust trials. This study supports integrating neurogenic targeting strategies into clinical practice, which could potentially revolutionize treatment paradigms in tendinopathy within pain medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41457115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.