ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal relationships between physical fitness and phase angle as a biomarker of cellular health in Brazilian male adolescents: a Bayesian analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The phase angle (PhA), derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), has gained attention as a non-invasive indicator of cellular health and body composition. However, its relationship with physical fitness development during adolescence remains underexplored. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the longitudinal associations between phase angle and changes in multiple physical fitness components in male adolescents, examining whether PhA serves as a biomarker for fitness development over time. We conducted a repeated-measures study involving 195 male adolescents aged 10-16 years from a school in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Physical fitness and BIA-derived PhA were assessed at three time points across two academic years (2018-2019), yielding 449 observations. Fitness measures included cardiorespiratory fitness (20-m shuttle run), muscular endurance (sit-up), flexibility (sit-and-reach), muscular power (standing long jump, medicine ball throw), speed (20-m sprint), and agility (4-m shuttle run). Phase angle was calculated using single-frequency BIA. Multilevel Bayesian hierarchical models estimated associations between standardized fitness outcomes, age, PhA, and their interaction, incorporating varying intercepts and slopes to account for individual differences. Age showed positive associations with performance in the 20-m shuttle run ([Formula: see text], 68% CI = [0.19, 0.31]), sit-up ([Formula: see text], 68% CI = [0.25, 0.37]), standing long jump ([Formula: see text], 68% CI = [0.30, 0.41]), and medicine ball throw ([Formula: see text], 68% CI = [0.50, 0.64]), indicating improvements in aerobic capacity and muscular fitness. Negative associations were observed for the 20-m sprint ([Formula: see text], 68% CI = [-0.31, -0.22]) and 4-m shuttle run ([Formula: see text], 68% CI = [-0.35, -0.23]), reflecting enhanced speed and agility. Adjustment for body mass and individual variability confirmed these patterns, though the effect of age on medicine ball throw was reduced. Physical fitness improved with age during adolescence, and phase angle demonstrated consistent positive associations with multiple fitness domains over time. These findings suggest that PhA may serve as a practical, non-invasive biomarker for monitoring physical fitness development in adolescents. Given its ease of implementation and cost-effectiveness, PhA could be integrated into school-based health screenings and fitness assessment programs to identify adolescents at risk for poor fitness trajectories and to evaluate the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Further research should examine these relationships in girls and across diverse populations to establish reference values and intervention thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.