ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Relaxometry assessment of meningioma consistency using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether relaxometry assessment using synthetic MRI (SyMRI) can predict meningioma consistency.
methodsEighteen patients with histologically confirmed meningioma were included, and all patients underwent quantitative MRI on a 3T MRI system using a 2D multi-dynamic multi-cho sequence. Quantitative MRI software version 11.3 (SyntheticMR AB, Linköping, Sweden) was used to generate quantitative maps of T1, T2 relaxation times and proton density (PD). Regions of interest were manually placed over all tumor slices to evaluate three parameters (T1, T2, PD). Comparing with the conventional method, relative values of the tumor-to-thalamus signal intensity ratio on the non-contrast T1-weighted image (T1R) and T2-weighted image (T2R) and apparent diffusion coefficients generated from b-values (0 and 1000 s/mm
resultsSoft meningiomas showed significantly longer T1 and T2 relaxation times and higher PDs than hard meningiomas (median value, p-value: 2701 vs. 1721 ms, p = 0.0009 for T1; 111 vs. 94 ms, p = 0.0047 for T2; 92 vs. 85%, p = 0.0092 for PD, respectively). The 90
conclusionRelaxometry assessment offers a reliable method for predicting meningioma consistency that can optimize surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41457092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.