ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental and RSM simulation assessment of Gamma-ray shielding efficiency of nano-modified concrete exposed to elevated temperatures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-analytical characterization and radiation shielding assessment of natural ophiolitic rocks: a combined experimental, mineralogical, and simulation analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Performance and Gamma Radiation Shielding of Hybrid Magnetite-Dolomite High-Density Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiation shielding and microstructural characteristics of nano-silica and nano-alumina modified cement composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The effect of steel waste addition as a cement replacement on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of sustainable concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study experimentally investigates the radiation shielding performance, characterized by the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) values, of concrete mixes incorporating lead monoxide (NL), nano-magnetite (NM), and nano-granodiorite (NG) as partial cement replacements (1-5%) under ambient and elevated temperatures (400-800 °C). The primary objective was to develop robust predictive models for the LAC values using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Results showed that exposure to elevated temperatures notably reduced the LAC of the control concrete, especially after heating to 800 °C. Incorporating nanomaterials effectively mitigated this deterioration, maintaining higher shielding efficiency. NL mixes showed the greatest improvement, with LAC increases of about 42.6% and 37.4% after exposure to 600 °C and 800 °C, respectively. NM mixes ranked second, enhancing LAC by 26.7% and 24.2% at the same temperatures, while NG provided moderate improvement of around 9.9% at 800 °C (4% replacement). The superior performance of NL and NM mixes is attributed to their high density and atomic number, which promote photon absorption and scattering within the concrete matrix, as well as the improved microstructural integrity resulting from the filler effect of the uniformly dispersed nanoscale particles. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) confirmed the high statistical significance and predictive power of the developed model, demonstrating an exceptional correlation between predicted and experimental data. The response surface analysis revealed that the nanomaterial dose and type are the dominant factor for enhancing LAC values, exhibiting a strong positive correlation, whereas elevated temperature has a detrimental effect. The observed curvature in the response surfaces confirmed significant non-linear and interaction effects between the input parameters. Optimization results demonstrated that a 5% nano-dose at various temperatures maximizes shielding performance, with NL identified as the most effective material, demonstrating superior radiation shielding properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.