Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41457060›Full record

ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2026

Nanomedicine Strategies Against Biofilm-Associated Infections: Advances, Challenges, and Translational Barriers.

Husni Farah, Munthar Kadhim-Abosaoda, Hayjaa Mohaisen-Mousa, S Renuka Jyothi, Priya Priyadarshini-Nayak, J Bethanney Janney, Gurjant Singh, Ashish Singh-Chauhan, Manoj Kumar-Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Husni FarahFaculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Munthar Kadhim-AbosaodaCollege of Pharmacy, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Hayjaa Mohaisen-MousaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Al-Turath University, Al-Mansour, Baghdad, Iraq.
S Renuka JyothiDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Priya Priyadarshini-NayakDepartment of Medical Oncology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0009-0001-8421-3630
J Bethanney JanneyDepartment of Biomedical, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gurjant SinghDepartment of Physiotherapy, University Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Chandigarh University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Ashish Singh-ChauhanFaculty of Engineering, Gokul Global University, Sidhpur, Gujarat, India.
Manoj Kumar-MishraSalale University, Fitche, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance continues to rise globally, with biofilm-associated infections intensifying the clinical burden through persistent tolerance to antibiotics and evasion of immune responses. Biofilms, structured microbial communities embedded in a protective extracellular matrix, underlie many chronic and recurrent infections, including endocarditis, urinary tract infections, cystic fibrosis lung disease, and device-related infections. Conventional antibiotics often fail in these contexts, and the discovery pipeline for novel agents remains limited. Nanotechnology has therefore emerged as a promising alternative, offering unique physicochemical features that enable enhanced penetration into biofilm matrices, improved drug stability, and targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. Diverse nanosystems, including metallic, polymeric, lipid-based, and ligand-functionalized platforms, have shown encouraging results in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating superior biofilm disruption and bacterial eradication compared with conventional therapies. Nevertheless, translating these advances into clinical practice remains challenging. Key barriers include complex and costly synthesis, scalability under good manufacturing practices, limited drug loading efficiencies, variability of preclinical biofilm models, regulatory uncertainties, and the risks of nanoparticle (NP)-induced toxicity, unpredictable biodistribution, and potential resistance development. Moreover, the dynamic interactions between NPs, host fluids, and biofilm extracellular matrices complicate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic predictability. Addressing these obstacles requires coordinated efforts to refine manufacturing processes, standardize biofilm models, and implement nanospecific regulatory frameworks. With careful optimization, nanomedicine holds the potential to redefine the therapeutic landscape for biofilm-related infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiofilmsNanomedicineAnimalsBacteriaDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistancebiofilmsdrug deliverynanoparticlestranslational nanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID41457060
PMCPMC12745177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.