ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2026
Nanomedicine Strategies Against Biofilm-Associated Infections: Advances, Challenges, and Translational Barriers.
Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Azithromycin in Dentistry: From Systemic Antibiotic to a Candidate for Local Therapeutic Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Bridging the "Valley of Death" in Antifungal Therapy: Next-Generation Biomimetic and Exosome-Inspired Nanocarriers for Invasive Candidiasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pre-Target Interception Defines Carbapenem Failure in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: A Mechanistic Framework for Spatiotemporal Drug Reprogramming.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Intelligent multimodal-energy-driven piezoelectric antibacterial platforms: From structural control to system-level diagnosis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine Strategies Against Biofilm-Associated Infections: Advances, Challenges, and Translational Barriers.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Editorial: Natural products and microbial interactions: from antimicrobial activity to microbial modulation.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Article
- Liposome drug delivery strategies: state-of-the-art for combating bacterial biofilms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Surfactant-Engineered Niosomal Antibiotic Systems for Biofilm-Associated Infections: Design Principles and Translational Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for precision targeted and controlled antimicrobial drug delivery in drug-resistant infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance continues to rise globally, with biofilm-associated infections intensifying the clinical burden through persistent tolerance to antibiotics and evasion of immune responses. Biofilms, structured microbial communities embedded in a protective extracellular matrix, underlie many chronic and recurrent infections, including endocarditis, urinary tract infections, cystic fibrosis lung disease, and device-related infections. Conventional antibiotics often fail in these contexts, and the discovery pipeline for novel agents remains limited. Nanotechnology has therefore emerged as a promising alternative, offering unique physicochemical features that enable enhanced penetration into biofilm matrices, improved drug stability, and targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. Diverse nanosystems, including metallic, polymeric, lipid-based, and ligand-functionalized platforms, have shown encouraging results in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating superior biofilm disruption and bacterial eradication compared with conventional therapies. Nevertheless, translating these advances into clinical practice remains challenging. Key barriers include complex and costly synthesis, scalability under good manufacturing practices, limited drug loading efficiencies, variability of preclinical biofilm models, regulatory uncertainties, and the risks of nanoparticle (NP)-induced toxicity, unpredictable biodistribution, and potential resistance development. Moreover, the dynamic interactions between NPs, host fluids, and biofilm extracellular matrices complicate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic predictability. Addressing these obstacles requires coordinated efforts to refine manufacturing processes, standardize biofilm models, and implement nanospecific regulatory frameworks. With careful optimization, nanomedicine holds the potential to redefine the therapeutic landscape for biofilm-related infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.