ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Alternative splicing contributes to plasticity and regulatory divergence in locally adapted house mice from the Americas.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alternative splicing is a major driver of transcriptome and proteome variation, but the role of alternative splicing in regulatory evolution is often overlooked. Alternative splicing can also contribute to phenotypic plasticity, which may be critical when taxa colonize new environments. Here, we investigate variation in alternative splicing among new wild-derived strains of mice from different climates in the Americas on both a standard and high-fat diet. We show that alternative splicing is widespread and highly context-dependent, underscoring its potential as a substrate for adaptation and plasticity. Comparisons between strains on different diets revealed abundant gene-by-environment interactions affecting alternative splicing. Most genes showed strain- and sex-specific diet responses, highlighting the importance of incorporating sex, genetic diversity, and environmental variation in studies of gene regulation. More often than not, genes that were differentially spliced between strains were not differentially expressed, adding to evidence that the 2 regulatory mechanisms often act independently. Moreover, patterns of expression and network analyses suggest that the 2 mechanisms differ in pleiotropic constraint. Importantly, divergence in alternative splicing was predominantly driven by cis-regulatory changes. However, trans changes affecting splicing may be central to plasticity, as they were impacted more by environmental variation. Finally, we performed scans for selection and found that, while genes with splicing divergence more often co-localized with genomic outliers associated with metabolic traits, they were not enriched for genomic outliers. Overall, our results provide evidence that alternative splicing plays an important role in gene regulation in house mice, contributing to divergence and plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.