ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Tirofiban for Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 48 Hours of Onset: Evidence From a Dual-Method Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching and Multivariable Regression.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Preemptive vs. Conventional Tirofiban Administration on the Outcomes in Acute Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of treatment strategies for early neurological deterioration after acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Tirofiban for Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 48 Hours of Onset: Evidence From a Dual-Method Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching and Multivariable Regression.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Tirofiban combined with aspirin for branch atheromatous disease: a propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have indicated the potential benefits of tirofiban in preventing early neurological deterioration (END) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 24 h of symptom onset. However, its efficacy and safety over a broader time window require further evaluation.
methodsThis multicenter study analyzed prospective data from AIS patients without large vessel occlusion (LVO), enrolled within 48 h of onset and with baseline NIHSS scores of 4-15. Participants received either intravenous tirofiban or oral antiplatelet therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of END (increase in NIHSS score ≥ 2 points within 7 days). The primary safety endpoint was intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days. The study employed a combined analysis method of multivariable regression and propensity score matching (PSM).
resultsAmong 371 enrolled patients (198 in the tirofiban group, 173 in the oral antiplatelet group), compared with the oral antiplatelet group, the incidence of END in the tirofiban group was significantly lower, as indicated by multivariate regression analysis (9.6% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.038) and PSM (10.6% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.031). Both statistical methods indicated that intravenous tirofiban can significantly facilitate early neurological improvement in patients at 7 and 14 days (p < 0.05) and enhance the probability of a mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated particular benefit for patients with branch atheromatous disease (BAD) (p = 0.041). No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in either group.
conclusionFor AIS patients without LVO, early intravenous tirofiban within 48 h of onset effectively reduced the risk of END and promoted early or long-term neurological improvement without increasing bleeding risk, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit in an extended time window, especially for the BAD subtype. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR2200061110.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.