Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41456924›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2025

Birth of a Language in the Backlands of Brazil.

Anderson Almeida-Silva, Remo Nitschke, Fernando Valls Yoshida, Vitor Nóbrega, Shigeru Miyagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anderson Almeida-SilvaDepartment of Linguistics, Federal University of Pernambuco.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-4885
Remo NitschkeInstitute for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution, University of Zurich.ORCID 0000-0002-3660-1006
Fernando Valls YoshidaDepartment of Linguistics, University of São Paulo.ORCID 0000-0002-4400-4869
Vitor NóbregaDepartment of Linguistics, University of São Paulo.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-0108
Shigeru MiyagawaInstitute of Bioscience, University of São Paulo.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-9463

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/03196-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is assumed that in order to acquire a language, children must be exposed to a language during the critical period, which generally lasts until puberty. Here, we report on Cena, an emergent sign language that has developed among a small group of deaf people in an isolated town in the state of Piauí, Brazil. Starting three generations ago, it has developed into a fully functioning communicative system with all characteristics of a typical human language even though Cena developed in a linguistic vacuum. What makes Cena interesting is that we are reasonably certain that Cena had no external input from the national sign language, Libras, or any other language during its formation. Cena challenges the assumption that to acquire the first language, the child must be exposed to a fully developed language. It developed from homesigns to an emergent sign language that is used for all aspects of village life. Cena also lends credence to the interactional model of language acquisition, which considers the interactions between the child and the caregivers to be the crucial element. The nativist model of language acquisition, which assumes a universal system underlying language, also plays a part. Through interaction, what arose is a system with characteristics essential to all human language.

Indexed as

DeafnessLanguageLanguage DevelopmentSign LanguageBrazilChildHumansCritical periodEmergent sign languageHomesignLanguage acquisitionLanguage evolutionSign languages

Identifiers

PMID41456924
PMCPMC12745058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.