ArticleWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2025
Nurses' Handover Satisfaction: Development and Validation of the Handover Quality Questionnaire.
Article in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The life satisfaction of intern nursing students and its relationship with flourishing: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Nurses' Handover Satisfaction: Development and Validation of the Handover Quality Questionnaire.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe handover process is a critical component of patient safety, enabling effective communication and the transfer of responsibility among nurses. However, despite their critical role, it is often compromised by interruptions, lack of standardization, and variability in practice, which may reduce quality and nurse satisfaction. Existing tools primarily measure information transfer and efficiency but rarely incorporate nurses' perspectives on safety and satisfaction. This gap underscores the need for a validated instrument that comprehensively assesses handover quality from both a professional and safety perspective.
objectivesTo develop and validate the Handover Quality Questionnaire (HAND-Q), a tool assessing nurses' satisfaction with handovers and their perceived impact on patient safety.
methodsHAND-Q development included a conceptualization phase (literature review, expert discussions) and a validation phase (pilot and large-scale testing). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA, CFA) assessed psychometric properties.
resultsEFA revealed four factors: Satisfaction, Patient Safety, Care Pathway Safety, and Handover Content. CFA confirmed good model fit. Inter-factor correlations showed strong links between handover quality and safety, alongside discrepancies between satisfaction and objective standards. LINKING EVIDENCE TO PRACTICE: The HAND-Q offers a practical tool to assess handover quality, support standardization, enhance patient safety, and inform training and digital solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.