Observational studyAmerican journal of preventive medicine2026
Continuity of Firearm Injury Documentation From Acute Care to Ambulatory Care Among Medicaid Enrollees in Oregon.
Observational study in American journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGunshot wounds are typically treated in acute care settings, but longer-term sequelae are likely treated by ambulatory care providers. To understand whether gunshot wounds treated in acute care settings are later documented in ambulatory care electronic health records, acute care claims and ambulatory care electronic health records data were linked. The primary objective was to determine the percentage of patients with a gunshot wound diagnosis in their ambulatory care electronic health records from all patients with both an acute care gunshot wound diagnosis and an observed follow-up ambulatory care visit. The second objective was to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with a patient having a gunshot wound diagnosis in their ambulatory care electronic health records.
methodsThis observational study linked Oregon Medicaid claims for acute gunshot wound with ambulatory care electronic health records in OCHIN's ADVANCE Data Warehouse from 2012 to 2022 for case identification. Patients with and without an International Classification of Diseases code for gunshot wound in their ambulatory care electronic health records were characterized using descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression conducted between 2024 and 2025 modeled predictors of gunshot wound diagnosis in follow-up ambulatory care electronic health records controlling for patient characteristics.
resultsOnly 34.3% of patients with a gunshot wound event treated in an acute setting and with an observed ambulatory care visit had a gunshot wound diagnosis in their ambulatory care electronic health records. Time between acute gunshot wound and follow-up ambulatory care and the severity of the acute gunshot wound injury were associated with having a gunshot wound ambulatory care electronic health records diagnosis. Patients identified as Black, non-Hispanic or Hispanic had higher odds of having a gunshot wound ambulatory care electronic health records diagnosis than those identified as White, non-Hispanic.
conclusionsMost people who had a gunshot wound treated in an acute care setting with a later ambulatory care visit did not have a gunshot wound diagnosis in their ambulatory care electronic health records, even though a gunshot wound event can be relevant history for ambulatory care providers and patient care. Strategies to document prior gunshot wound in ambulatory electronic health records should be developed to support whole-person care in ambulatory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.