Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41456601›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Machine learning-based integration of radiomics and dosiomics for early prediction of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter study.

Xiaoming Sun, Huijun Zhu, Jian Qiao, Yingying Liang, Zhipeng Zhu, Sixue Dong, Jiazhou Wang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoming SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Huijun ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jian QiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yingying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhipeng ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Sixue DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-4843
Jiazhou WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9012-6605

Funding

Applied Research Programs of Health and Technology Commission Foundation of Guangxi S2023086Foundation of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University hbrc202104National Key Research and Development Program of China YFC20232413900National Natural Science Foundation of China 12475339Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology Fund 25TS1405300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study developed and validated a multimodal machine learning model integrating clinical, radiomics, and dosiomics characteristics to predict radiation-induced temporal lobe injury (RTLI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

methodsThis study utilized dual-center retrospective cohorts comprising 213 patients. From pre-treatment 3D computed tomography (CT) scans and radiation dose maps, we extracted 43 radiomics features and 43 dosiomics features. These quantitative imaging features underwent a rigorous three-stage selection pipeline-including auto-correlation analysis, significance testing (t-tests), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized logistic regression (LASSO-LR)-yielding 24 optimal image-derived predictors (13 radiomics and 11 dosiomics features). In parallel, eight clinical features were preserved in all final models due to their established clinical relevance and prior biological significance. We systematically evaluated twelve predictive configurations by integrating three machine learning algorithms-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR)-with four feature modalities: clinical-only, radiomics-only, dosiomics-only, and an integrated feature set.

resultsThe SVM-based integrated model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.819 during internal validation while maintaining robust generalizability in external testing (AUC = 0.714). The model exhibited excellent specificity (0.844) and remarkable cross-cohort stability, as evidenced by low performance variability (standard deviation: ±0.077 in validation, ±0.056 in testing). These findings highlight the synergistic value of integrating clinically established parameters with quantitative characterization of anatomical heterogeneity (radiomics) and radiation dose distribution patterns (dosiomics) for accurate prediction of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury.

conclusionThis clinically applicable predictive framework enables early identification of high-risk RTLI patients, facilitating timely interventions to mitigate neurotoxicity. The model's demonstrated multicenter validity, high specificity, and balanced performance across evaluation metrics address critical limitations of current prediction approaches, representing a significant advance in personalized radiation oncology for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTemporal LobeAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsRadiotherapy Dosagedosiomicsmachine learningpredictive modelingradiation‐induced temporal lobe injuryradiomicssupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID41456601
PMCPMC12744924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.