ReviewInternational journal of oncology2026
Targeted therapies for urothelial carcinoma: From FGFR inhibitors to next‑generation antibody-drug conjugates (Review).
Review in International journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of urothelial carcinoma (UC), particularly in metastatic or cisplatin‑ineligible patients, remains challenging because of limited durable responses to conventional chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Recent advances in targeted therapies, including FGFR inhibitors (for example, erdafitinib) and antibody‑drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting Nectin‑4 (enfortumab vedotin) and HER2 (disitamab vedotin), have reshaped treatment paradigms. FGFR3 alterations, which are present in 20‑40% of patients with advanced UC, predict sensitivity to FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, whereas ADCs demonstrate efficacy across biomarker‑selected and unselected populations. However, clinical implementation is complicated by resistance mechanisms, such as kinase switching, phenotypic plasticity and tumor microenvironment interactions, as well as biomarker heterogeneity. The present review synthesizes current evidence on molecularly guided therapies, contrasts resistance mechanisms between FGFR inhibitors and ADCs, and evaluates strategies to overcome therapeutic limitations. By integrating translational insights and emerging preclinical data, it was aimed to provide a roadmap for optimizing biomarker‑driven approaches, novel combinations and next‑generation agents for the treatment of UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.