ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Using root cause analysis to improve the quality of loaner instrument receiving in the central sterile supply department: A retrospective study.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Challenges Associated With Loaner Instrument Sets.AORN journal · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to use root cause analysis to identify the underlying causes of defects in receiving loaner instruments and to implement an improvement plan.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 23,780 loaner instrument packages reprocessed by our central sterile supply department from January to July 2023, prior to the root cause analysis-based intervention, were classified into the control group, and 25,258 loaner instrument packages reprocessed by our central sterile supply department from January to July 2024, following the intervention, were classified into the experimental group. The overall incidence rate of defects, incidence rate of each defect, and 37 central sterile supply department staff members' satisfaction with loaner instrument reprocessing before and after intervention were compared.ResultsAmong the 23,780 packages in the control group, 409 (1.72%) exhibited receiving defects, whereas among the 25,258 packages in the experimental group, 159 (0.63%) had receiving defects. Instrument mismatch and lack of source information were identified as the primary receiving defects. Improvements to the training system, operating procedures, traceability system, and hierarchical supervision were the main contributors to the reduction in defects. The mean satisfaction score of the central sterile supply department staff improved from 89.92 to 93.03.ConclusionsRoot cause analysis can be used to reduce defects associated with loaner instrument receiving and improve staff satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.