Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41456024›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Photo coding: a pragmatic approach to measuring intervention fidelity in a pharmacy system re-design.

Stephanie M Resendiz, Shiying Mai, Aaron M Gilson, Jamie A Stone, Emily L Hoffins, Jason S Chladek, Taylor L Watterson, Katherine G Moore, Michelle A Chui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie M ResendizDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Shiying MaiDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Aaron M GilsonSonderegger Research Center for Improved Medication Outcomes, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Jamie A StoneChui SAMS (Systems Approach to Medication Safety) Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Emily L HoffinsDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy, 833 S. Wood St. Chicago, Madison, IL, 60612, USA.
Jason S ChladekDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Public Health, St. John's University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Queens, NY, 11439, USA.
Taylor L WattersonDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy, 833 S. Wood St. Chicago, Madison, IL, 60612, USA.
Katherine G MooreChui SAMS (Systems Approach to Medication Safety) Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Michelle A ChuiChui SAMS (Systems Approach to Medication Safety) Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. michelle.chui@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0894-0959

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS027737AHRQ HHS R18HS027737NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring intervention fidelity can help justify the transition of evidence-based practices into everyday community-based practices by helping identify components of the intervention supporting the intervention's uptake. Current methods to measure fidelity include self-reported data, observational data using audio or video recordings, and in-vivo observations, but these are limited due to cost-ineffectiveness, time inefficiency, and external validity threats. Photo coding is proposed as a new, pragmatic method of observational data to measure intervention fidelity, as was used in a pharmacy system re-design intervention (Senior Safe™) to improve over-the-counter (OTC) medication safety for older adults.

methodsGuided by human factors engineering principles, Senior Safe re-shelved OTC medications based on safety level, and signage was added to designate safer and high-risk products. Senior Safe was implemented by pharmacy leadership and maintained by pharmacy staff. Pharmacy leadership and researchers collaborated to take photos of Senior Safe two times (Time 1 and Time 2), at least three months apart, to examine intervention layout and medication categorization fidelity. A Layout Codebook was constructed to evaluate the conformity of signage to ergonomic principles. A Medication Categorization Codebook was designed to assess whether the signage was properly allocated to the designated products. Two research assistants and two PharmD students coded the photos. A fidelity standard of ≥ 80% concordance with intervention guidelines was used to signify high-fidelity.

resultsFidelity was assessed within 67 pharmacy sites implementing Senior Safe. All sites achieved ≥ 80% fidelity concordance between Time 1 and Time 2 for the Layout Codebook. Alternatively, for the Medication Categorization Codebook, 97% of sites met high-fidelity standards during Time 1, compared to 85% of sites at Time 2, indicating statistically significant negative drift. Overall, over half of all Time 1 and Time 2 concordance rates involving the Layout and Medication Categorization Codebooks exceeded the ≥ 80% high-fidelity standard.

conclusionMeasuring intervention fidelity is useful in determining whether interventions are sustained and successfully transitioned into community-based practice. Photo coding is an innovative approach to measure intervention fidelity and allows researchers to identify multiple layers of concordance and discordance to intervention guidelines. Organizations are encouraged to investigate intervention fidelity, including identifying discordance and adaptation needs.

Indexed as

AdaptationCommunity pharmacyIntervention fidelityMedication safety

Identifiers

PMID41456024
PMCPMC12860130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.