ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Predicting Zygosity based on physical similarity of twin pairs with the aid of machine learning methods.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the importance of distinguishing identical and non-identical twins and the high cost of genetic testing, the ability to estimate zygosity using self-reported methods could be invaluable in reducing the costs of twin research. This study develops a machine learning framework to predict zygosity using physical similarity features, offering a scalable alternative.
methodsOur data were retrieved from the Iranian School-aged Twin Registry from 2018 to 2021. After preprocessing and cleaning the raw data, class imbalance (60:40 ratio) was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to enhance the prediction of twin zygosity based on physical similarity. Through this study, eight machine learning (ML) algorithms—including K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and boosting techniques (Gradient Boosting Classifier, XGBoost, AdaBoost Classifier)—were developed and trained on an 80:20 train-test split to predict zygosity. Model hyperparameters were optimized by GridSearchCV, and performance was evaluated using multiple metrics. Finally, the most influential factors were determined by the SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) algorithm.
resultsUsing data from 5,077 Iranian twin pairs, machine learning models to predict zygosity (monozygotic vs. dizygotic) based on 11 physical similarity traits were developed. To address class imbalance, the SMOTE oversampling technique was employed. Among eight algorithms evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance after optimization, achieving 85.57% accuracy and an F1-score of 86.72%. While XGBoost, Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting performed comparably without statistically significant differences, XGBoost was selected for its marginal lead and further analyzed using SHAP to interpret the feature importance of physical traits in zygosity prediction.
conclusionThis study establishes XGBoost with SMOTE oversampling as an optimal framework for twin zygosity prediction through physical similarity questionnaires. In future studies, with sufficient funding for genetic tests to determine zygosity, external validation of the obtained model and comparison of its results with the results of genetic tests will be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.